Search for: "Perez v. State of Louisiana"
Results 1 - 20
of 46
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Dec 2018, 9:38 am
State of Louisiana, Dkt. [read post]
14 Sep 2010, 4:11 pm
"Sonny" Chastain and Linda Perez Clark The Louisiana Supreme Court in Cheramie Services, Inc. v. [read post]
28 Oct 2014, 1:50 pm
Perez-Gimenez said that he had no choice because of the 1972 precedent and because of the First Circuit’s comments about Baker v. [read post]
21 Aug 2014, 6:18 am
By Lisa Milam-Perez, J.D. [read post]
20 Sep 2016, 9:24 pm
Perez, in his Official Capacity as United States Secretary of Labor, The Wage and Hour Division of the Department of Labor; Dr. [read post]
24 Mar 2010, 11:18 am
Consider porn star Stormy Daniels and her potential Louisiana State Senate run. [read post]
7 Sep 2016, 7:00 am
Most of their privacy claims under the Louisiana Constitution also advanced (Taylor v. [read post]
13 Aug 2015, 7:58 am
By Lisa Milam-Perez, J.D. [read post]
27 Mar 2015, 3:37 am
” The plaintiffs were the states of Texas, Louisiana, Arkansas, and Nebraska. [read post]
3 Mar 2016, 5:19 am
Fushman, “Perez v. [read post]
8 Sep 2016, 7:24 am
By Lisa Milam-Perez, J.D. [read post]
30 Dec 2013, 5:25 am
We praised Perez here.4. [read post]
7 Jun 2013, 3:58 am
Mix, 2013 WL 2100264 (U.S.District Court for the Eastern District of Louisiana 2013); U.S. v. [read post]
21 Oct 2014, 7:21 pm
Judge Perez-Gimenez focused the first part of his constitutional analysis on the Supreme Court’s summary ruling in Baker v. [read post]
15 May 2018, 4:19 am
Perez, two complex redistricting cases from Texas, and Animal Science Products v. [read post]
27 Jun 2015, 2:50 pm
See The Fredericksburg Care Company L.P. v Juanita Perez et al. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm
Supreme Court in the case of Perez v. [read post]
1 Oct 2011, 1:31 pm
Supreme Court in the case of Perez v. [read post]
20 Mar 2011, 9:31 am
A challenge to a policy that prohibited inmates confined to their cells for disciplinary infractions from attending religious services was dismissed as moot since the policy has been changed.In Perez v. [read post]
